scott <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
> Whilst true, a bit of a silly statistic only looking at half the story.  A 
> better measure would be "lives saved as a direct result of actions minus 
> lives lost as a direct result of actions".  I suspect doctors would be 
> firmly ahead by a long way then...

  OTOH it's basically impossible to measure how many lives are saved thanks
to guns.

  For example, how many lives were saved thanks to the Normandy landings
and subsequent fall of Germany? Completely impossible to say.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message